Program Rule

Forced Refit Is a Feature, Not a Burden

TriSeadon rejects the idea that ships should be built, left alone for decades, and then rescued by a giant mid-life overhaul. The fleet is supposed to stay current through scheduled, enforced refit windows that keep systems advancing without stopping production or creating obsolete subclasses. The standard 60-month refit has a 90-day authorized planning window containing a detailed 74-day work schedule and a 16-day margin for delay, rework, weather, retest, and return-to-service work. A major refit is an exception and may take longer.

Core rule: every hull enters the standard 60-month refit on a planned 5-year cadence. This is the only scheduled refit cycle. A major refit is an exception event used when an IWM, IMM, or gas-turbine sled must be replaced because of approved upgrade, malfunction, battle damage, casualty, or failure.

Why It Matters

Keeps ships advanced: sensors, EW, energy systems, software, unmanned-control systems, and weapon modules update on schedule instead of waiting for crisis-driven fixes.
Prevents orphan classes: older flights do not become stranded one-off variants because upgrades are built into the lifecycle from the start.
Controls cost: regular shorter modernization windows are easier to budget than rare, massive overhaul shocks.
Protects production: the fleet keeps building while older ships rotate through refit lanes rather than forcing a halt for redesign.
Supports combat credibility: no ship is allowed to drift too far behind in sensors, networks, survivability, or weapons handling.

Refit Schedule Lock

Rule Locked Baseline
Standard refit cadence Every 5 years after commissioning
Major refit definition Exception-only yard event for IWM, IMM, or GT sled replacement tied to upgrade, malfunction, damage, casualty, or failure
Typical standard refit duration 90-day authorized planning window: 74-day detailed work schedule plus 16-day margin for delay, rework, weather, retest, and return-to-service work
Upgrade method Block/refit insertion through IWMs, IMMs, software, sensors, power modules, and selected propulsion updates, with full diesel, pod, and battery replacement on the 60-month cycle
Production-award freeze No stakeholder or capability change after award; improvements roll to the next hull, lot, flight, or standard 60-month refit. Verified corrective action is controlled separately and cannot be used to add capability.
Technology insertion cap No more than 3 major new technologies per hull flight or revision cycle
Mission-module rule IWM and IMM changes during build, the standard 60-month refit, or exception major refit when the ship is actually changing weapon or mission modules; ISO modules remain port-swappable

What Happens During Refit

Standard 60-Month Refit Sequence

Operating logic: the whole sequence is built around repair-by-replacement where possible. The ship comes out of refit with fleet-standard verified replacement components, weapons, craft, and modules. Removed items do not go straight back into service; they enter a controlled DLA rebuild and certification loop, are fixed or rebuilt as needed, repainted and maintained, and only then return to inventory for future installation. In planning terms this standard sequence is 74 days inside a 90-day authorized window, with 16 days reserved for delay, rework, weather, retest, and return-to-service margin. If IWM, IMM, or GT-sled replacement grows beyond that baseline because of upgrade, damage, malfunction, casualty, or failure, the ship enters an exception major refit that may take longer.

Why Forced Refit Beats the Old Model

Old Model

  • Long neglect between upgrades
  • Large mid-life overhaul shocks
  • Fleet splits into incompatible generations
  • Urgent fixes become budget emergencies

TriSeadon Model

  • Predictable 5-year modernization rhythm
  • Shorter, scheduled yard periods
  • Common interfaces preserve cross-flight compatibility
  • Ships stay relevant without halting production

Related Pages